﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Waterbury Personal Injury Lawyer - All Topics - Most Commented</title>
    <description>If you or a family member have been injured due to the fault of another please contact a Waterbury Personal Injury Lawyer today.</description>
    <link>http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/all-topics/most-commented/</link>
    <atom:link href="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/all-topics/most-commented/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Medical Device Safety Act of 2008</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;U.S. Reps. Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ), Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health, and Henry A. Waxman (D-CA), Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, recently introduced legislation in the House that will reverse a U.S. Supreme Court decision earlier this year involving medical devices&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In February, the U.S. Supreme Court immunized medical device companies from state lawsuits brought by patients who are injured by certain medical devices. In Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc. the Court found that the product liability claims are barred by a preemption clause included in the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (MDA). This decision was wrong.  It ignored both congressional intent and 30 years of experience in which FDA regulation and tort liability played complementary roles in protecting consumers from device risks. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Medical Device Safety Act of 2008 protects patients from dangerous and defective devices by correcting the Court’s flawed interpretation of the MDA. The legislation explicitly clarifies that state product liability lawsuits are preserved.  People should contact thier elected Congressmen and Senator to voice support of this legislation to ensure that injured people have a right to compensation for injuries caused by dangerous and defective medical devices.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/medical-device-safety-act-of-2008.aspx?googleid=242888"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by James Sabatini</description>
      <link>http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/medical-device-safety-act-of-2008.aspx?googleid=242888</link>
      <source url="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/all-topics/most-commented/">Waterbury Personal Injury Lawyer - All Topics - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Medical Devices &amp; Implants</category>
      <category>products liability</category>
      <category> medical devices</category>
      <dc:creator>James Sabatini</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:45:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Two Car Accident Injures Five in Portland</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A two-car accident near Portland, CT injured five people and closed down parts of Route 66 for nearly two hours on Saturday, August 29th, according to the &lt;a href="http://www.courant.com/community/portland/hc-portland-route-66-crash-0830,0,5527094.story"&gt;Hartford Courant&lt;/a&gt;.  Police are still investigating the accident, but it has been confirmed that &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;a 2003 Subaru Outback traveling eastbound on Route 66 crossed the center line and crashed head on into a 2008 Nissan Altima going westbound at 2:52 p.m. Saturday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The crash seriously injured all drivers and passengers involved:  two in the Subaru and three in the Altima.  One passenger injured was a fourteen-year-old girl.  The cause of the crash is still being investigated, but at the time of the accident it was raining lightly and the road was wet.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to the &lt;a href="http://www.ct.gov/dot/lib/dot/documents/dpolicy/ctaf/ctaf.pdf"&gt;Connecticut Department of Transportation&lt;/a&gt;, accidents involving injuries decreased from 2000 to 2006.  In 2000, there were 34,447 accidents involving injuries and 27,366 in 2006.  Some interesting facts presented by the Connecticut DOT from data gathered from 1997 to 2006 show that the highest number of traffic accidents occur in the month of May, on Fridays, and from 5pm to 5:59pm.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/automobile-accidents/two-car-accident-injures-five-in-portland.aspx?googleid=270038"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href="http://www.injuryboard.com/Margaret-Embry/"&gt;Margaret Embry&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/automobile-accidents/two-car-accident-injures-five-in-portland.aspx?googleid=270038</link>
      <source url="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/all-topics/most-commented/">Waterbury Personal Injury Lawyer - All Topics - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Automobile Accidents</category>
      <category>Car accident</category>
      <category> driving in rain</category>
      <dc:creator>Margaret Embry</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:17:16 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bunk Beds Recalled By Land of Nod Due to Fall Hazard</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Land of Nod, in cooperation with the CPSC, voluntarily &lt;a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09720.html"&gt;recalled 750 Cottage Bunk Beds&lt;/a&gt; because screws are missing from the upper bunk&amp;rsquo;s guardrails, which can cause the vertical slats to detach posing a fall hazard to small children.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To date, the company has not received any reports of injury but there has been two incidents in which the vertical slats detached from the upper bunk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The recalled beds were sold in both white (model #s 236-519 and 188-174) and pine/honey finishes (model #s 459-410 and 172-596) and included a long and a short upper bunk guardrail, each of which should be secured to the inside of the upper bunk beds side rail with screws. Stickers bearing the model numbers are located on the inside of the lower bunk headboard.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The agency recommends checking that all screws needed to attach the guardrails to the upper bunk have been installed. If you find your bed is missing screws, you should contact The Land of Nod to receive new screws free of charge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Consumer Contact: &lt;/b&gt;For additional information, contact The Land of Nod at (800) 933-9904, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. CT, Monday through Friday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/defective-and-dangerous-products/bunk-beds-recalled-by-land-of-nod-due-to-fall-hazard.aspx?googleid=258642"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href="http://www.injuryboard.com/Chrissie-Cole/"&gt;Chrissie Cole&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/defective-and-dangerous-products/bunk-beds-recalled-by-land-of-nod-due-to-fall-hazard.aspx?googleid=258642</link>
      <source url="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/all-topics/most-commented/">Waterbury Personal Injury Lawyer - All Topics - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Defective &amp; Dangerous Products</category>
      <category>Fall Hazard</category>
      <dc:creator>Chrissie Cole</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Triple A Releases 2006 Auto Crash Data</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;According to the Triple A, 42,642 people died in car crashes in 2006.  This equates to about 117 deaths per day and almost 5 per hour.  This is the equivalent of two jumbo jets crashing every week.  The AAA attributes many of the fatalities to excessive speed, drunk driving and the failure to wear a seat belt.  Triple A also reports that the costs arising from car accidents have gone up with the largest cost increase being hospital costs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/automobile-accidents/triple-a-releases-2006-auto-crash-data.aspx?googleid=232640"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by James Sabatini</description>
      <link>http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/automobile-accidents/triple-a-releases-2006-auto-crash-data.aspx?googleid=232640</link>
      <source url="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/all-topics/most-commented/">Waterbury Personal Injury Lawyer - All Topics - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Automobile Accidents</category>
      <category>Motor Vehicle Accidents</category>
      <dc:creator>James Sabatini</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:09:13 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Truck Driver Arrested In School Bus Accident</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The driver of a Poland Spring delivery truck that collided with a school bus Monday afternoon was criminally charged this morning with speeding and running a red light. Accoprding to police, Christopher Speedling, 24, was going 42 mph in a 30mph zone. Witnesses also told police that he ran a red light before the crash.  He is charged with failure to obey a traffic signal and traveling at an unreasonable speed. It is unclear from press reports if the driver was also charged with reckless driviing. Five students at Plainville High School who were on the bus suffered a variety of non life-threatening injuries and were taken to area hospitals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/automobile-accidents/truck-driver-arrested-in-school-bus-accident.aspx?googleid=231638"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by James Sabatini</description>
      <link>http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/automobile-accidents/truck-driver-arrested-in-school-bus-accident.aspx?googleid=231638</link>
      <source url="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/all-topics/most-commented/">Waterbury Personal Injury Lawyer - All Topics - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Automobile Accidents</category>
      <category>Motor Vehicle Accidents</category>
      <dc:creator>James Sabatini</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:48:53 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Waterbury Drunk Driving Accident Lawyers</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If you have been injured by a drunk driver, it is vital that you contact a Connecticut drunk driving accident lawyer as soon as possible.  Why? - because not only is the drunk driver liable for your injuries and losses, but the establishment that served the alcohol to the drunk driver.  You have 120 days to put the dram shop on written notice of your intention of filing a claim against it.  If written notice is not given within the 120 days, you will be prohibited from bringing a dram shop claim against the establishment.  The dram shop is strictly liable for up to $250,000.00 for injuries and losses caused by the intoxicated individual.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/automobile-accidents/waterbury-drunk-driving-accident-lawyers.aspx?googleid=231388"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by James Sabatini</description>
      <link>http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/automobile-accidents/waterbury-drunk-driving-accident-lawyers.aspx?googleid=231388</link>
      <source url="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/all-topics/most-commented/">Waterbury Personal Injury Lawyer - All Topics - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Automobile Accidents</category>
      <category>Motor Vehicle Accidents</category>
      <dc:creator>James Sabatini</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:21:29 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Emergency Room Patients Waiting Longer</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Patients seeking urgent care in U.S. emergency rooms are waiting longer than in the 1990s, especially people with heart attacks, U.S. researchers reported on Tuesday.  The longer waits affect insureds and uninsureds equally. They found a quarter of heart attack victims waited 50 minutes or more before seeing a doctor in 2004. Waits for all types of emergency department visits became 36 percent longer between 1997 and 2004, the team at Harvard Medical School reported.  The longer waits are being attributed to the fact that emergency room patients are not money makers for the hospitals, thus emergency rooms are being shut down or scaled down.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more information on this subject, please refer to the section on &lt;a href="http://www.injuryboard.com/help-center/medical-malpractice/"&gt;Medical Malpractice and Negligent Care.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/medical-malpractice/emergency-room-patients-waiting-longer.aspx?googleid=230520"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by James Sabatini</description>
      <link>http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/medical-malpractice/emergency-room-patients-waiting-longer.aspx?googleid=230520</link>
      <source url="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/all-topics/most-commented/">Waterbury Personal Injury Lawyer - All Topics - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Medical Malpractice</category>
      <category>Medical Malpractice</category>
      <dc:creator>James Sabatini</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:05:23 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Avoiding Car Accidents During Bad Winter Weather</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Bad winter weather is all too common for drivers in Connecticut and throughout the Northeast.  Obviously, the best safety tip in avoiding a car accident in bad winter weather is to stay off the roads.  But, this is not always a viable option.  Many of us need to get to work or reach an important destination such as a pharmacy or hospital, so if you are out driving in winter weather keep these practical safety tips in mind.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. Watch out for shaded areas on the road.  Due to the lack of sun exposure, these shaded areas typically will have snow and ice where the rest of the sunlight roadway is clear of snow and ice.&lt;br /&gt;2. For older cars, check your battery, cable connections, alternator and drive belts.  Check your cooling system to make sure that you have the right mix of fresh antifreeze and water.  Check hoses for cracks or leaky connections.  These checks can prevent an engine from dying on the roadway leaving you stranded in bad weather.&lt;br /&gt;3.  Make sure the tires on the car are winter tires or all-season tires.  Furthermore, make sure the tires still have good tread.  Worn tires will not grip the roadway causing the car to slip and slide.&lt;br /&gt;4.  Keep a half a tank of gas in the tank.  If you get caught in traffic or in a snowbank, you want sufficient gas to keep the car running and heated.&lt;br /&gt;5.  Keep a safety kit in your car that includes a bottle of water, candy bar, flashlight, gloves, jumper cables, and flares.&lt;br /&gt;6.  Keep a bag of sand and shovel in the trunk.  If you get stuck in snow, you can use the shovel for the snow and then lay down the sand to give your tires traction when getting out of the snow.&lt;br /&gt;Following these safety tips will hopefully prevent a car accident or car breakdown during bad winter weather, but if a car accident does happen, these tips will make the accident a lot more manageable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more information on this subject, please refer to the section on &lt;a href="http://www.injuryboard.com/help-center/auto-accidents/"&gt;Car and Motorcycle Accidents.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/automobile-accidents/avoiding-car-accidents-during-bad-winter-weather.aspx?googleid=229394"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by James Sabatini</description>
      <link>http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/automobile-accidents/avoiding-car-accidents-during-bad-winter-weather.aspx?googleid=229394</link>
      <source url="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/all-topics/most-commented/">Waterbury Personal Injury Lawyer - All Topics - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Automobile Accidents</category>
      <category>Motor Vehicle Accidents</category>
      <dc:creator>James Sabatini</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:43:58 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Negligence Lawsuits Filed Against St. Francis Hospital - Failure To Supervise Dr. Reardon</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Two men who say they were sexually molested by Dr. George Reardon filed lawsuits Thursday against St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center, claiming the hospital was negligent in its supervision of the doctor during the 30 years he practiced there. In the latest suits, the men say Reardon fondled and photographed them in his private St. Francis office during the 1970s or early 1980s. One suit claims Reardon took as many as 1,000 "sexualized" pictures of the plaintiff, both alone and posed with his three brothers. The lawsuits assert that St. Francis bears responsibility for the abuse because it failed to properly supervise Dr. Reardon, who was an employee of the hospital. At least 80 people so far have come forward with allegations of sexual molestation by Dr. Reardon during the time that he was employed by St. Francis Hospital.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more information on this subject, please refer to the section on &lt;a href="http://www.injuryboard.com/help-center/medical-malpractice/"&gt;Medical Malpractice and Negligent Care.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/miscellaneous/negligence-lawsuits-filed-against-st-francis-hospital-failure-to-supervise-dr-reardon.aspx?googleid=228980"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by James Sabatini</description>
      <link>http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/miscellaneous/negligence-lawsuits-filed-against-st-francis-hospital-failure-to-supervise-dr-reardon.aspx?googleid=228980</link>
      <source url="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/all-topics/most-commented/">Waterbury Personal Injury Lawyer - All Topics - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Miscellaneous</category>
      <dc:creator>James Sabatini</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:38:37 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Numerous Injuries In Train Crash</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;At least five Amtrak crew members were critically or seriously injured Friday when their train collided with a freight train traveling on the same track.  About 100 or 150 passengers have been injured in this &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/11/30/trains.collide/index.html"&gt;train collision &lt;/a&gt;in Chicago.  The cause of the collision is under investigation.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/miscellaneous/numerous-injuries-in-train-crash.aspx?googleid=228632"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by James Sabatini</description>
      <link>http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/miscellaneous/numerous-injuries-in-train-crash.aspx?googleid=228632</link>
      <source url="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/all-topics/most-commented/">Waterbury Personal Injury Lawyer - All Topics - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Miscellaneous</category>
      <dc:creator>James Sabatini</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:52:51 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>