﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Waterbury Personal Injury Lawyer - Medical Devices &amp; Implants</title>
    <description>If you or a family member have been injured due to the fault of another please contact a Waterbury Personal Injury Lawyer today.</description>
    <link>http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/</link>
    <atom:link href="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Medical Device Safety Act of 2008</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;U.S. Reps. Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ), Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health, and Henry A. Waxman (D-CA), Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, recently introduced legislation in the House that will reverse a U.S. Supreme Court decision earlier this year involving medical devices&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In February, the U.S. Supreme Court immunized medical device companies from state lawsuits brought by patients who are injured by certain medical devices. In Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc. the Court found that the product liability claims are barred by a preemption clause included in the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (MDA). This decision was wrong.  It ignored both congressional intent and 30 years of experience in which FDA regulation and tort liability played complementary roles in protecting consumers from device risks. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Medical Device Safety Act of 2008 protects patients from dangerous and defective devices by correcting the Court’s flawed interpretation of the MDA. The legislation explicitly clarifies that state product liability lawsuits are preserved.  People should contact thier elected Congressmen and Senator to voice support of this legislation to ensure that injured people have a right to compensation for injuries caused by dangerous and defective medical devices.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/medical-device-safety-act-of-2008.aspx?googleid=242888"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by James Sabatini</description>
      <link>http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/medical-device-safety-act-of-2008.aspx?googleid=242888</link>
      <source url="http://waterbury.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/">Waterbury Personal Injury Lawyer - Medical Devices &amp; Implants</source>
      <category>Medical Devices &amp; Implants</category>
      <category>products liability</category>
      <category> medical devices</category>
      <dc:creator>James Sabatini</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:45:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>